If a geography hierarchy for a country has been imported, can you add another geography type in the middle of the structure?

When a geography hierarchy has been imported into the system, it typically means that the structure is already defined and established with a specific order and relationship between the various geographic types. In most systems, altering this hierarchy to insert a new geography type in the middle of the structure is not permitted because it could disrupt the existing relationships and dependencies within the hierarchy.

A well-defined geography hierarchy functions like a tree with branches that cannot be easily modified without potentially complicating the metrics, reporting, or processes that depend on that hierarchy. Adding a geography type in the middle could lead to inconsistencies and confusion regarding geographic classification, which may affect functionality across the Human Capital Management system.

Therefore, the ability to alter the structure by inserting a new geography type is generally not allowed, maintaining the integrity and stability of the geographic data model.